United States v. Barber’s Empirical Analysis
557 F.2d 628 · 1977
Citation profile
27 federal appellate · 3 district · 5 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 40 later decisions — most recently July 2013 · most notably United States v. White (1981), United States v. Luschen (1980)
27 federal appellate · 3 district · 5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2
Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Wong Sun v. United States · Simmons v. United States · Jones v. United States · Brown v. Illinois
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 40 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“since the [police's] initial entry was improper and the items were thrown out the window as a direct result of that illegality, the police were not entitled to the fruits.”); Jeffries, 311 A.2d at 918 (concluding that suppression is warranted when the”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Jones v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.