Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

557 F.2d 819

Docket Patent Appeal No. 76-711.

In re Ackerman

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · decided 1977-06-23

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently June 1977

2 counsel of record

Relies on In re Voss

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1977-06-23

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Clinton S. Janes, Jr., Corning, N.Y., attorney of record, for appellants.

¶2Joseph F. Nakamura, Washington, D.C., for the Commissioner of Patents; Fred E. McKelvey, Jere W. Sears, Washington, D.C., of counsel.

¶3Before MARKEY, Chief Judge, RICH, BALDWIN, and MILLER, Judges, and SCOVEL RICHARDSON, Associate Judge, United States Customs Court.

¶4MILLER, Judge.

¶5Identical issues having been disposed of in Patent Appeal No. 76-710, In re Voss, Cust. & Pat.App., 557 F.2d 812 decided this date, the decision of the Patent and Trademark Office Board of Appeals is reversed in accordance with our opinion in that case.

¶6REVERSED.

/557/f2d/819 · .json · Public domain