Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 557 F.3d 1066 - Doe v. See

Doe v. See’s Empirical Analysis

557 F.3d 1066 · 2009

Citation profile

62
cited by 62 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
5
states following
March 2022
most recently cited

17 federal appellate · 15 district · 5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 62 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 2022 · most notably Swarna v. Al-Awadi (2010), Terenkian v. Republic of Iraq (2012)

17 federal appellate · 15 district · 5 state decisions

560200920102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1330 (§ 2 of the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act of 1976) · 28 U.S.C. § 1603 (§ 4 of the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act of 1976) · 28 U.S.C. § 1604 (§ 4 of the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act of 1976) · 28 U.S.C. § 1605 (§ 4 of the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act of 1976) · 28 U.S.C. § 1607 (§ 4 of the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act of 1976) · 28 U.S.C. § 2680

Relies on Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly · Coopers & Lybrand v. Livesay · Abney v. United States · United States v. Gaubert · Berkovitz v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 62 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “introduced no evidence contesting any of the allegations”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “any case not otherwise covered by this chapter in which money damages are sought against a foreign state for personal injury or death that was caused by [specified acts] if such act ... is engaged in by an official, employee, or agent of such, foreign state while acting within the scope of his or her office, employment, or agency.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “that a relationship of principal and agent is created”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.