Internet Solutions Corp. v. Marshall’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

2 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “DOES POSTING ALLEGEDLY DEFAMATORY STORIES AND COMMENTS ABOUT A COMPANY WITH ITS PRINCIPAL PLACE OF BUSINESS IN FLORIDA ON A NON-COMMERCIAL WEBSITE OWNED AND OPERATED BY A NONRESIDENT WITH NO OTHER. CONNECTIONS TO FLORIDA CONSTITUTE COMMISSION OF A TORTIOUS ACT WITHIN FLORIDA FOR PURPOSES OF . FLA. STAT. § 48.193(l)(b)?”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. Internet Solutions Corp. v. Marshall · 39 So. 3d 1201 - Internet Solutions Corp. v. Marshall

2. “First, we examine whether the exercise of jurisdiction would be appropriate under that state’s long-arm statute. “Second, we examine whether the exercise of personal jurisdiction over the defendant would violate the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution.” The due process inquiry requires us to determine whether “the defendant ha[s] minimum contacts with the forum state” and if the district court’s exercising of jurisdiction over that defendant would “offend traditional notions of fair play and substantial justice.””

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. 39 So. 3d 1201 - Internet Solutions Corp. v. Marshall

3. “The defendant then must raise, through affidavits, documents or testimony, a meritorious challenge to personal jurisdiction.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. Miller v. Gizmodo Media Grp., LLC