Wasserman v. Rodacker’s Empirical Analysis
557 F.3d 635 · 2009
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 14 district ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1441 · 28 U.S.C. § 1446 · 28 U.S.C. § 1451 · 28 U.S.C. § 2402 · 28 U.S.C. § 2675 · 28 U.S.C. § 2679
Relies on Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics · Graham v. Connor · Pearson v. Callahan · Whren v. United States · Duncan v. Walker
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“suggested that he might try to resist or escape,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.