Sullivan v. Oracle Corp.’s Empirical Analysis
557 F.3d 979 · 2009
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 29 U.S.C. § 213
Relies on 14 Cal. 4th 557 - Tidewater Marine Western, Inc. v. Bradshaw · 112 Cal. App. 4th 16 - California School of Culinary Arts v. Lujan · 42 Cal. App. 4th 1850 - Campbell v. Arco Marine, Inc. · Burnside v. Kiewit Pacific Corp. · Sullivan v. Oracle Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“First, does the California Labor Code apply to overtime work performed in California for a California-based employer by out-of-state plaintiffs in the circumstances of this case, such that overtime pay is required for work in excess of eight hours per day or in excess of forty hours per week? Second, does § 17200 apply to the overtime work described in question one? Third, does § 17200 apply to overtime work performed outside California for a California-based employer by out-of-state plaintiffs in the circumstances of this case if the employer failed to comply with the overtime provisions of the FLSA?”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.