557 F. Supp. 562 - Evans v. Interstate Brands Corp.’s Empirical Analysis
1983
Citation profile
2 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 701 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)
Relies on McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green · Bonner v. City of Prichard · Rideout v. United States · McDonald v. Santa Fe Trail Transportation Co. · William F. TURNER, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. TEXAS INSTRUMENTS, INCORPORATED, Defendant-Appellant
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[A]s long as a minority employee is discharged under circumstances in which a non-minority employee would not have been or in fact was not discharged, there exists a genuine issue of material fact as to the real reason behind the termination of the minority employee. In any situation in which a black employee is fired while a white employee is retained ‘under similar circumstances,’ the fact of dissimilar punishment for similar conduct raises an inference of racial discrimination sufficient to preclude the grant of summary judgment in favor of the defendant employer.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Payne v. Frank“(1) that plaintiff was a member of a protected group; (2) that there was a company policy of practice concerning the activity for which he or she was discharged; (3) that non-minority employees either were given the benefit of lenient company practice or were not held to compliance with a strict company policy; and (4) that the minority employee was disciplined either without the application of a lenient policy, or in conformity with the strict one.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Payne v. Frank
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.