557 F. Supp. 2d 688 - Serrano v. Sterling Testing Systems, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
2008
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 1681 · 15 U.S.C. § 1681C · 15 U.S.C. § 1681S
Relies on Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly · Conley v. Gibson · Federal Trade Commission v. TRW, Inc. · Samuel Myers v. The Bennett Law Offices Doug McCallon Timothy Myers · Lendino v. Trans Union Credit Information Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“information which may have, or may reasonably be expected to have, an unfavorable bearing on a consumer's eligibility or qualifications for credit, insurance, employment, or other benefit.” Serrano v. Sterling Testing Systems, Inc., 557 F.Supp.2d 688, 692 (E.D.Pa.2008) (quoting In re Miller, 335 B.R. 335, 346 (Bkrtcy.E.D.Pa.2005)). Seamans’s payment history is adverse information under this definition. As Seamans says,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.