Eakin v. Mitchell-Leech’s Empirical Analysis
1990
Citation profile
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 162 Ind. App. 658 - Economy Oil Corp. v. Indiana Department of State Revenue · Baker v. COMPTON · Mishler v. County of Elkhart · Persinger v. Lucas · Indiana State Board of Tax Commissioners v. Fraternal Order of Eagles, Lodge No. 255
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the statute clearly and unambiguously requires that the health care provider or its insurer shall have paid the maximum $100,000 ... before access may be had to the fund.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent“If a health care provider or its insurer has agreed to settle its liability on a claim by payment of its policy limits of one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000), and claimant is demanding an amount in excess thereof, then the following procedure must be followed[.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Eakin v. Reed“Subject matter jurisdie tion is the power of courts to hear and determine cases of the general class to which the proceeding then before the court belongs.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Eakin v. Reed
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.