State v. Kone’s Empirical Analysis
1996
Citation profile
9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
May 2003
most recently cited
9 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Ohio v. Roberts · Pointer v. Texas · Idaho v. Wright · Eureka Urethane, Inc. v. P.B.A., Inc. · Fryer v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(A) the statement is offered as evidence of a material fact; (B) the statement is more probative on the point for which it is offered than any other evidence which the proponent can procure through reasonable efforts; and (C) the general purposes of these rules and the interests of justice will best be served by admission of the statement into evidence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Heuser“unless the proponent of it makes known to the adverse party sufficiently in advance of trial ... to provide the adverse party with a fair opportunity to prepare to meet it, the proponent's intention to offer the statement and the particulars of it, including the name and address of the declarant.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Heuser
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.