Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 557 P2D 130 - Smith v. State

Smith v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1976

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
1
states following
July 2017
most recently cited

18 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently July 2017

18 state decisions

6019761980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Wong Sun v. United States · Aguilar v. Texas · Spinelli v. United States · Stone v. Powell · United States v. Rabinowitz

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'to be employed to blindly sustain the actions of the magistrate or to place any reviewing court in a position that it may refuse to examine the factual basis for such issuance.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Our Constitution is some stronger, in that it uses 'affidavit' instead of 'oath or affirmation'; the word 'affidavit' requiring the matter to be in written form.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “It is fundamental constitutional law, of course, that a search warrant may issue only upon a showing that there is probable cause to believe that the item sought is located on the premises for which the search warrant is requested. [[Image here]] But of course it cannot follow in all eases, simply from the existence of probable cause to believe a suspect guilty, that there is also probable cause to search his residence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.