Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 557 So. 2d 1030 - State v. Johnson

557 So. 2d 1030 - State v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

103
cited by 103 later decisions
1
states following
December 2014
most recently cited

102 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 103 later decisions — most recently December 2014 · most notably 612 So. 2d 191 - State v. Sparrow (1992), 729 So. 2d 664 - State v. Ash (1999)

102 state decisions

610199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Terry v. Ohio · 446 So. 2d 729 - State v. Prudholm · 416 So. 2d 528 - State v. Ratcliff · 428 So. 2d 444 - State v. Seiss · 505 So. 2d 714 - State v. Brooks

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 103 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"Reasonable suspicion" is something less than the probable cause required for an arrest, and the reviewing court must look to the facts and circumstances of each case to determine whether the detaining officer had sufficient facts within his knowledge to justify an infringement of the suspect's rights. State v. Jones, supra . Mere suspicion of activity is not a sufficient basis for police interference with an individual's freedom. State v. Williams, 421 So.2d 874 (La.1982).”
    23 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “A. A law enforcement officer may stop a person in a public place whom he reasonably suspects is committing, has committed, or is about to commit an offense and may demand of him his name, address, and an explanation of his actions.”
    21 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “without benefit of probation, parole or suspension of sentence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.