Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 557 So. 2d 1034 - State v. Jackson

557 So. 2d 1034 - State v. Jackson’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

39
cited by 39 later decisions
1
states following
May 2019
most recently cited

39 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 39 later decisions — most recently May 2019 · most notably State v. Egana (1997), 584 So. 2d 356 - State v. Collins (1991)

39 state decisions

190199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · 539 So. 2d 105 - State v. Reaux · State v. Young · State ex rel. Hines v. Guillory · 514 So. 2d 602 - State v. Walker

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 39 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““in this ease the only possible evidence to support a finding that the defendant exercised dominion and control over the drugs was that she was standing next to the paraphernalia which had traces and residue of cocaine. There was no evidence that the residue-containing pipe was warm, that the defendant’s fingerprints were on any item, that the defendant tested positive for cocaine, or that the defendant was anything more than a guest in the apartment. We conclude that the evidence is legally insufficient to establish that the defendant exercised any dominion or control over the objects which had residue and traces of cocaine.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “does not reasonably permit a finding of guilt.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.