Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 557 So. 2d 1318 - Day v. State

557 So. 2d 1318 - Day v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1989

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
October 2017
most recently cited

12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently October 2017

12 state decisions

601989199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Strough v. State · 513 So. 2d 68 - Kyser v. State · Welcher v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “a judicial admission sufficient to support a conviction before restitution can be ordered.”
    8 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. BMJ v. State · Grace v. State
  2. “"[I]t is essential to be fair and impartial in the administration of justice, that all perpetrators of criminal activity or conduct be required to fully compensate all victims of such conduct or activity for any pecuniary loss, damage or injury as a direct or indirect result thereof. "”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. B.M.J. v. State · BMJ v. State
  3. “'Criminal activities' is defined at § 15-18-66 (1) as '[a]ny offense with respect to which the defendant is convicted or any other criminal conduct admitted by the defendant.' 'Victim' is defined in paragraph (4) of § 15-18-66 as '[a]ny person [who] the court determines has suffered a direct or indirect pecuniary damage as a result of the defendant's criminal activities.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. BMJ v. State · 641 So. 2d 1256 - Murphy v. State

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.