557 So. 2d 533 - Doby v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1990
Citation profile
41 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 41 later decisions — most recently October 2017 · most notably 671 So. 2d 581 - Walker v. State (1995), 684 So. 2d 643 - Davis v. State (1996)
41 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 361 So. 2d 1360 - Irving v. State · Stringer v. State · Peterson v. State · 530 So. 2d 694 - Davis v. State · Reddix v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 41 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[i]f a defendant opens the door to line of testimony, ordinarily he may not complain about the prosecutor's decision to accept the benevolent invitation to cross the threshold.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“it is the duty of the appellant to present a record of the trial sufficient to show that the error of which he complains on appeal has occurred and, further, the error was timely and properly preserved.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“[T]he general principle is that `the failure of either party to examine a witness equally accessible to both is not a proper subject of comment before the jury by either of the parties.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Burke v. State · Foley v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.