Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 557 SO2D 796 - Stringer v. State

Stringer v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

26
cited by 26 later decisions
2
states following
September 2009
most recently cited

26 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 503 So. 2d 803 - Wetz v. State · 506 So. 2d 254 - Boches v. State · Tubbs v. State · 481 So. 2d 263 - Clements v. Young · 481 So. 2d 312 - Ruffin v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “... has [not] waived his right to challenge the weight or sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the judgment against him.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[O]nce the jury has returned a verdict of guilty in a criminal case, we are not at liberty to direct that the defendant be discharged short of a conclusion on our part that given the evidence, taken in the light most favorable to the verdict, no reasonable, hypothetical juror could find beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant was guilty.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “the inferences flowing from the possession of the articles mentioned could just as well infer possession for personal use as intent to deliver the contraband to another person.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.