Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 557 So. 2d 848 - Ward v. State

557 So. 2d 848 - Ward v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

121
cited by 121 later decisions
1
states following
September 2018
most recently cited

120 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 121 later decisions — most recently September 2018 · most notably 728 So. 2d 691 - Farrior v. State (1998), 594 So. 2d 1253 - McMillian v. State (1991)

120 state decisions

690199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 368 So. 2d 871 - Cumbo v. State · Skelton v. City of Birmingham · Day v. State · 378 So. 2d 1173 - Turner v. State · 50 Ala. App. 646 - Lloyd v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 121 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “`When there is legal evidence from which the jury could, by fair inference, find the defendant guilty, the trial court should submit [the case] to the jury, and, in such a case, this court will not disturb the trial court's decision.'”
    46 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[t]he test to be applied is whether the jury might reasonably find that the evidence excluded every reasonable hypothesis except that of guilt; not whether such evidence excludes every reasonable hypothesis but guilt, but whether a jury might reasonably so conclude.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “`When reviewing a trial court's denial of a motion for a judgment of acquittal, this court must determine "whether there existed legal evidence before the jury, at the time the motion was made, from which the jury by fair inference could have found the appellant guilty.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.