557 So. 2d 851 - Baker v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1990
Citation profile
7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
February 2012
most recently cited
7 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Colorado v. Connelly · Lightbourne v. Dugger · 549 So. 2d 122 - Holladay v. State · 549 So. 2d 135 - Ex Parte Holladay
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"The fact that a defendant may suffer from a mental impairment or low intelligence will not, without other evidence, render a confession involuntary. See Colorado v. Connelly , 479 U.S. 157 , 107 S.Ct. 515 , 520 , 93 L.Ed.2d 473 (1986); Singleton v. Thigpen , 847 F.2d 668 (11th Cir. 1988); Whittle v. State , 518 So.2d 793 (Ala.Cr.App. 1987); Holladay v. State , 549 So.2d 122 (Ala.Cr.App. 1988), aff'd , 549 So.2d 135 (Ala. 1989). The United States Supreme Court, in Connelly , 479 U.S. at 164 , 107 S.Ct. at 520 , 93 L.Ed.2d at 482 , stated: 'Absent police conduct causally related to the confession, there is simply no basis for concluding that any state actor has deprived a criminal defendant of due process of law.' "”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage““In determining the voluntariness of a confession, the court must examine all of the attendant circumstances. Agee v. State, 465 So.2d 1196 (Ala.Cr.App.1984). ‘The true test of determining whether extrajudicial confessions are voluntary is whether the defendant’s will was overborne at the time he confessed so that the confession was not the product of rational intellect and a free will.’ Thomas v. State, 531 So.2d 45, 47 (Ala.Cr.App.1988) (citations omitted).””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Carden v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.