Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 558 A2D 369 - Theriault v. Swan

Theriault v. Swan’s Empirical Analysis

1989

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
4
states following
June 2019
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 2 district · 8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently June 2019

3 federal appellate · 2 district · 8 state decisions

701989199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Gammon v. Osteopathic Hospital of Maine, Inc. · Werner v. Lane · 42 Md. App. 291 - Kelch v. Mass Transit Administration · State v. Mason · Gendron v. Pawtucket Mutual Insurance

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In order to recover for either negligent or reckless infliction of emotional distress, a plaintiff must demonstrate that the harm alleged reasonably could have been expected to befall the ordinarily sensitive person. Gammon v. Osteopathic Hospital of Maine, Inc., 534 A.2d 1282, 1285 (Me.1987). When the harm reasonably could affect only the hurt feelings of the supersensitive plaintiff-the eggshell psyche-there is no entitlement to recovery. Id. If, however, the harm reasonably could have been expected to befall the ordinarily sensitive person, the tortfeasor must take his victim as he finds her, extraordinarily sensitive or not. Restatement (Second) of Torts § 461 (1975).”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.