Zaoutis v. Kiley’s Empirical Analysis
558 F.2d 1096 · 1977
Citation profile
10 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently December 2015
10 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1103 (§ 103 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1151 (§ 201 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1256 (§ 246 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Udall v. Tallman · Burnett v. New York Central Railroad · Eisenstadt v. Baker · Peter Pan Fabrics, Inc. v. Martin Weiner Corp. · Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Estate L Noel H M
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“... at any time within five years after the status of a person has been otherwise adjusted under the provisions of section 1255....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“what Congress meant by the term 'appear to the satisfaction'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.