Glasco v. Hills’s Empirical Analysis
558 F.2d 179 · 1977
Citation profile
11 federal appellate · 5 district · 6 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 48 later decisions — most recently January 2019 · most notably Continental Group, Inc. v. Amoco Chemicals Corp. (1980), Mississippi Power & Light Co. v. United Gas Pipe Line Co. (1985)
11 federal appellate · 5 district · 6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Ohio Oil Co. v. Conway · A. O. Smith Corporation v. Federal Trade Commission, in No. 75--1282. Inland Steel Company v. Federal Trade Commission, in No. 75--1283. Northwest Industries, Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission, in No. 75--1284. Oscar Mayer & Co. Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission, in No. 75--1285. Merck & Co., Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission, in No. 75--1286. Hobart Corporation v. Federal Trade Commission, in No. 75--1287. The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company v. Federal Trade Commission, in No. 75--1288. Thomas J. Lipton, Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission, in No. 75--1289 · Brawer v. Horowitz · Danielson v. Local 275, Laborers International Union of North America · United States Steel Corp. v. Fraternal Ass'n of Steelhaulers
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 48 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“We have said that the requisite feared injury or harm must be irreparable — not merely serious or substantial. “ ‘The word means that which cannot be repaired, retrieved, put down again, atoned for ... Grass that is cut down cannot be made to grow again; but the injury can be adequately atoned for in money. The result of the cases fixes this to be the rule: the injury must be of a peculiar nature, so that compensation in money cannot atone for it ... . ’ Gause v. Perkins, 3 Jones Eq. 177 , 69 Am.Dec. 728 (1857). ‘Irreparable injury is suffered where monetary damages are difficult to ascertain or are inadequate.’ Danielson v. Local 275, Laborers Union, 479 F.2d 1033 , 1037 (2d Cir. 1973).” A. O. Smith, supra, 530 F.2d at 525 . ****** It was a necessary prerequisite for a preliminary injunction that the tenants show irreparable injury. No probative evidence supporting this sine qua non was adduced before the district court prior to the orders of February and April, 1976, the subject matter of this appeal. At best, the claimed injury was financial, a loss of money, a loss capable of recoupment in a proper action at law.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“'The word means that which cannot be repaired, retrieved, put down again, atoned for ... Grass that is cut down cannot be made to grow again; but the injury can be adequately atoned for in money. The result of the cases fixes this to be the rule: the injury must be of a peculiar nature, so that compensation in money cannot atone for it ....' Gause v. Perkins, 3 Jones Eq. 177, 69 Am.Dec. 728 (1857). 'Irreparable injury is suffered where monetary damages are difficult to ascertain or are inadequate.' Danielson v. Local 275, Laborers Union, 479 F.2d 1033 , 1037 (2d Cir. 1973).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“) sought to prevent rent increases required by the owner and approved by HUD. The district court denied the tenants' motion for a preliminary injunction against the rent increases. This court affirmed the denial of injunctive relief, on the ground that no showing of irreparable injury had been demonstrated. Judge Aldisert, writing for the court, discussed the character of irreparable injury. He wrote: 51 We have said that the requisite feared injury or harm must be irreparable-not merely serious or substantial.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.