Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 558 F.2d 249 - Irwin v. United States

Irwin v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

558 F.2d 249 · 1977

Citation profile

43
cited by 43 later decisions
2
states following
September 2007
most recently cited

17 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 43 later decisions — most recently September 2007 · most notably Hayden v. First National Bank (1979), Orkin Exterminating Co. v. Federal Trade Commission (1988)

17 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions

3301977198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Corn Products Refining Company v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue · Brunswick Corp. v. Vineberg · Vera Croley, Etc. v. Matson Navigation Company, David E. Bouler v. Matson Navigation Company · National Labor Relations Board v. Smith Industries, Inc. · Booth Newspapers, Inc. v. The United States. The Evening News Association v. The United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 43 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Thus, "where motive, intent, subjective feelings and reactions, consciousness and conscience [are] to be searched, and examination and cross-examination [are] necessary instruments in obtaining the truth,” summary judgment is inappropriate. Alabama Great So. R.R. Co. v. Louisville and Nashville R.R. Co., supra at 5.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “T)he jury would be free to find that (Manufacturers') burden had not been met because of possible lack of credibility of (its) witness. . . .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.