Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 558 F.2d 522 - United States v. Thompson

United States v. Thompson’s Empirical Analysis

558 F.2d 522 · 1977

Citation profile

69
cited by 69 later decisions
7
states following
June 2019
most recently cited

51 federal appellate · 2 district · 10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 69 later decisions — most recently June 2019 · most notably United States v. McConney (1984), State v. Moore (2000)

51 federal appellate · 2 district · 10 state decisions

38019771980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3731 · 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act)

Relies on Wong Sun v. United States · Schneckloth v. Bustamonte · United States v. Watson · Patterson v. United States · Barrett v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 69 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A motion made before trial shall be determined before trial unless the court, for good cause, orders that it be deferred for determination at the trial of the general issue or until after verdict, but no such determination shall be deferred if a party’s right to appeal is adversely affected.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “officer attempting to make an investigatory detention may properly display some force when it becomes apparent that an individual will not otherwise comply with his request to stop.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Id. at 525 (citing Fed. R. Crim. P. 12(e) (providing that a court could defer a hearing on a motion to suppress made before trial as long as no”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.