United States v. Turner’s Empirical Analysis
558 F.2d 535 · 1977
Citation profile
54 federal appellate · 1 district · 11 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 79 later decisions — most recently July 2012 · most notably State v. Carter (1995), Landes Construction Co. v. Royal Bank of Canada (1987)
54 federal appellate · 1 district · 11 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Swain v. State of Alabama · Lewis v. United States · Pointer v. United States · Stilson v. United States · New England Enterprises, Inc. v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 79 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[A]cceptance of a panel cannot be deemed a waiver of a peremptory challenge in respect of [sic] a person who was not a member of the panel at the time the jury was accepted.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“one of the most important rights secured to the accused.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Id. In addition, the defendant must be given adequate notice of the system that the court uses for exercising peremptories. Id. 40 Quinones makes two related claims of error regarding the peremptory challenge procedure exercised by the district court. First, Quinones argues that the court did not give him the required notice as to what procedure it would use. Second, Quinones argues that the court restricted his right to exercise his peremptory challenges intelligently. 1. Adequate Notice 41 Local Rule 162 of the Eastern District of California states that”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.