Manygoats v. Kleppe’s Empirical Analysis
558 F.2d 556 · 1977
Citation profile
39 federal appellate · 14 district · 6 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 80 later decisions — most recently December 2024 · most notably Makah Indian Tribe v. Verity (1990), North Slope Borough v. Andrus (1980)
39 federal appellate · 14 district · 6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Provident Tradesmens Bank & Trust Co. v. Patterson · Kleppe v. Sierra Club · McClanahan v. State Tax Commission of Arizona · Alfred Dunhill of London, Inc. v. Republic of Cuba · Keeble v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 80 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“nothing in NEPA which exempts Indian lands from national policy.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“'whether the statement is a good faith, objective, and reasonable presentation of the subject areas mandated by NEPA'”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority““In summary, then, our view is that the review of EIS is limited to the following: ‘(1) Whether EIS discusses all of the five procedural requirements of NEPA.’ ‘(2) Whether the environmental impact statement constitutes an objective good faith compliance with the demands of NEPA.’ ‘(3) Whether the statement contains a reasonable discussion of the subject matter involved in the five required areas.’ ””
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.