United States v. Barker’s Empirical Analysis
558 F.2d 899 · 1977
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 922 (Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act)
Relies on United States v. Tateo · Bryan v. United States · Forman v. United States · Sapir v. United States · United States v. Musquiz
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““This is not like the case where evidence prejudicial to the defendant is ad mitted [or evidence beneficial is omitted] at the first trial, and a conviction obtained [and then reversed].” United States v. Barker, 558 F.2d 899, 902 (8th Cir.1977).”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.