Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 558 F.2d 956 - United States v. Garcia-Rodriguez

United States v. Garcia-Rodriguez’s Empirical Analysis

558 F.2d 956 · 1977

Citation profile

42
cited by 42 later decisions
6
states following
July 2009
most recently cited

28 federal appellate · 1 district · 6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 42 later decisions — most recently July 2009 · most notably United States v. United States (1985), United States v. Wanless (1989)

28 federal appellate · 1 district · 6 state decisions

2101977198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Glasser v. United States · Coolidge v. New Hampshire · Chambers v. Maroney · United States v. Brignoni-Ponce · Cupp v. Naughten

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 42 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A party has no vested interest in any particular form of instructions . . . the language of the instructions is for the trial court to determine. If on the entire charges it appears that the jury has been fairly and adequately instructed, the requirements of the law are satisfied.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “A trial judge need not give an instruction proposed by counsel on either side, provided he gives adequate instructions on each element of the case.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.