Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 558 F.3d 495 - United States v. Hunter

United States v. Hunter’s Empirical Analysis

558 F.3d 495 · 2009

Citation profile

30
cited by 30 later decisions
April 2025
most recently cited

5 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently April 2025 · most notably United States v. Anderson (2012), United States v. Beasley (2009)

5 federal appellate · 1 district ·

190200920102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 922 (Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 924 · 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 846 (§ 406 of the Controlled Substances Act)

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · United States v. Olano · Cuyler v. Sullivan · Johnson v. United States · United States v. Craven

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Actual possession exists when an individual knowingly has direct physical control over a thing at a given time, and constructive possession exists when a person does not have physical possession but instead knowingly has the power and the intention at a given time to exercise dominion and control over an object, either directly or through others.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “For the foregoing reasons, we REVERSE Hunter’s conviction and sentence for violating 18 U.S.C. § 924 (c)(1), but we AFFIRM Hunter’s other convictions and sentences. Accordingly, we REMAND for such further proceedings consistent with this opinion as are necessary.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “possession of a firearm in furtherance of a drug trafficking crime.” The plea agreement and judgment stated the crime as”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.