United States v. Glover’s Empirical Analysis
558 F.3d 71 · 2009
Citation profile
22 federal appellate · 3 district · 2 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3553 · 18 U.S.C. § 922 (Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 924
Relies on Chapman v. State of California · Taylor v. United States · Griffin v. California · Begay v. United States · James v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“to qualify as a crime of violence under the residual clause, the offense at issue must also “(i) pose a degree of risk that is similar to the degree of risk posed by the enumerated offenses—namely, Arson, burglary, extortion, and offenses involving the use of explosives—and (ii) be similar ’in kind’ to those offenses.” /”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“we consider the totality of the circumstances, including the severity of the misconduct, the prosecutor's purpose in making the statement . . . , the weight of the evidence supporting the verdict, jury instructions, and curative instructions.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“a prosecutor may cross the line [into impermissibility] by arguing to the jury that the defendant is obligated to present evidence of his innocence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.