558 F. Supp. 91 - Burrell v. Swartz’s Empirical Analysis
1983
Citation profile
1 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently August 2010
1 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1915 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Griffin v. People of the State of Illinois · Douglas v. People of State of California · Coppedge v. United States · Blanton v. General Electric Credit Corp. · Gilliam v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“No [such] right exists to an absolutely accurate trial transcript.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Forte v. Sullivan
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.