Williams v. Long’s Empirical Analysis
2008
Citation profile
3 district ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1367 · 29 U.S.C. § 201 (American Samoa Labor Standards Amendments of 1956) · 29 U.S.C. § 206 (Equal Pay Act of 1963)
Relies on City of Chicago v. International College of Surgeons · Lyon v. Whisman · Painter v. Harvey · Sue & Sam Manufacturing Company v. B-L-S Construction Company v. Robert O. Lee, Trading as St. Stephen's Knitwear, Sue & Sam Manufacturing Company v. B-L-S Construction Company v. Robert O. Lee, Trading as St. Stephen's Knitwear · 497 F. Supp. 2d 381 - Rivera v. Ndola Pharmacy Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“bars the litigation of a claim if (1) the parties in the present litigation are the same or in privity with the parties to the earlier litigation; (2) the claim presented in the subsequent action is ‘identical to that determined or that which could have been raised and determined in the prior litigation’; and (3) there was a final judgment on the merits in the prior litigation.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“derive from a common nucleus of operative fact.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.