Davidson v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1990
Citation profile
59 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 59 later decisions — most recently July 2015 · most notably Hardin v. State (1993), Smith v. State (1996)
59 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Daniel v. Security Pacific National Bank · Rogers v. First National Bank of Peoria · Bush v. Florida · 3 Cal. 3d 615 - People v. Archerd · 44 Cal. 3d 589 - People v. Ruiz
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 59 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Unless the defendant is entitled to severance as a matter of right under Ind.Code 35-34-1-11(a), whether to sever multiple charges is a matter within the trial court's discretion, taking into account the three factors listed in the statute, and a denial of severance will be reversed only upon a showing of clear error.”). 9 . Frentz observes that the State did not respond to his argument that any error in the denial of his motions to sever the drug charges was not harmless. It is true, as Frentz states, that”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“In the case at bar, a pattern is evident of insuring an infant’s life prior to the infant’s suspicious drowning; the com mon modus operandi, as well as the same motive, serve to connect the crimes sufficiently to justify joinder for trial over the defendant’s motion for severance.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Jester v. State · Pardo v. State“[elx-cluding evidence in any judicial proceeding resulting from a report of a child who may be a victim of child abuse or neglect, relating to the subject matter of such a report....”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Fout v. State · Devore v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.