Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 558 NW2D 329 - State v. LaMorie

State v. LaMorie’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
2
states following
February 2007
most recently cited

7 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on United States v. LaMorie · State v. Ringquist · State v. Rydberg · State v. Johnson · State v. Woehlhoff

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “One of the fundamental precepts of our judicial system is that the finder of fact must rely only on the evidence presented in court. We have developed comprehensive rules regulating procedures and admissibility of evidence, all concerned with ensuring that trials are conducted fairly and that evidence submitted meets threshold indicia of reliability. These fundamental principles are ignored when a finder of fact goes outside the record and conducts its own informal investigation of factual matters without knowledge of the parties.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “A trial court must decide factual matters only upon the evidentiary record of testimony and exhibits in that court.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.