Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 558 P2D 487 - Haskins v. Shelden

Haskins v. Shelden’s Empirical Analysis

1976

Citation profile

56
cited by 56 later decisions
8
states following
March 2017
most recently cited

1 district · 55 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 56 later decisions — most recently March 2017 · most notably Amfac, Inc. v. Waikiki Beachcomber Investment Co. (1992), Sturm, Ruger & Co., Inc. v. Day (1979)

1 district · 55 state decisions

22019761980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Holiday Inns of America, Inc. v. Peck · State v. Phillips · Lewis v. State · McClung-Logan Equipment Co. v. Thomas · 66 N.J. Super. 22 - Winkler v. Hartford Acc. and Ind. Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 56 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A party who fails to so object is not entitled to review of an instruction unless it appears that giving the challenged instruction was plain error such that a miscarriage of justice would occur if the instruction was not reviewed.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Although the trial court’s discretion under Rule 82 is broad enough to warrant denial of attorney's fees altogether, denial of a proper motion for attorney’s fees by the prevailing party may not result from improper motive. (Emphasis supplied.)”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “"Prejudgment interest is in the nature of compensation for use by [the] defendant of money to which [the] plaintiff is entitled from the time the cause of action accrues until the time of judgment. It is not meant to be an additional penalty."”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.