Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 558 P.2d 581 - Van Schaack v. Phipps

Van Schaack v. Phipps’s Empirical Analysis

1976

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
2
states following
August 2015
most recently cited

2 district · 17 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently August 2015

2 district · 17 state decisions

11019761980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Cathedral Estates, Inc. v. Taft Realty Corp. · Bell v. Arnold · Smith Ex Rel. Leech v. Mills · Fladung v. City of Boulder · Field v. Sisters of Mercy

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “" After the pleadings are closed but within such time as not to delay the trial, any party may move for judgment on the pleadings. If, on a motion for judgment on the pleadings, matters outside the pleadings are presented to and not excluded by the court, the motion shall be treated as one for summary judgment and disposed of as provided in Rule 56, and all parties shall be given reasonable opportunity to present all material made pertinent to such a motion by Rule 56." (emphasis added)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Where the fact of the futility of a shareholder demand is placed in issue by the depositions and exhibits in the court file, it is error to grant summary judgment on the ground that plaintiff’s complaint fails to allege the demand for shareholder relief required by C.R.C.P. 23.1.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “Where it is obvious from the face of the complaint that the requisite demand upon shareholders was not made and no explanation for the lack of demand is offered, an action by the shareholder will not lie.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.