Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 558 Pa. 473 - Commonwealth v. Ortiz

Commonwealth v. Ortiz’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
3
states following
August 2019
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Fisher v. City of Berkeley · United States v. Holland · Commonwealth v. Seay · State v. Sealy · Commonwealth v. Dunphy

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he common meaning of 'place of abode' is the actual house or apartment of a person. It does not include common areas to which a person has a right of access but which are shared with others who have a similar right of access. ... The shared backyard of the apartment house in which appellee's apartment is located is no more appellee's 'place of abode' than is a tenant's shared elevator or fitness center in a high-rise apartment complex.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “a place where one actually lives or has a home.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.