Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 558 So. 2d 1 - Burch v. State

558 So. 2d 1 - Burch v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

83
cited by 83 later decisions
3
states following
September 2007
most recently cited

83 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 83 later decisions — most recently September 2007 · most notably Heggs v. State (2000), 616 So. 2d 1 - State v. Johnson (1993)

83 state decisions

69019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Flick-Reedy Corp. v. Hydro-Line Manufacturing Co. · 458 So. 2d 269 - Florida Bar v. Johnson · 507 So. 2d 1080 - Smith v. Department of Ins. · Board of Public Instruction of Broward Cty. v. Doran · 545 So. 2d 279 - State v. Burch

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 83 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “is whether or not the provisions of the bill are designed to accomplish separate and disassociated objects of legislative effort.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “for dissimilar legislation having no necessary or appropriate connection with the subject matter. See State v. Lee, 356 So.2d 276 (Fla.1978). The test for determining duplicity of a subject”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “(e) Except as authorized by this chapter, it is unlawful for any person to sell, purchase, manufacture, or deliver, a controlled substance in, on or within one thousand feet of the real property comprising a public or private elementary, middle or secondary school. Any person who violates this paragraph with respect to: (1) A controlled substance named or described in section 893.03(1)(a), (1)(b), (1)(d), (2)(a), or (2)(b) is guilty of a felony of the first degree.... (2) A controlled substance named or described in section 893.03(1)(c), (2)(c), (3), or (4) is guilty of a felony of the second degree.... Florida Statutes, § 893.13(1)(e) (1987).”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.