Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 558 SO2D 138 - Horner v. State

Horner v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
March 1994
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 383 So. 2d 1186 - Beugnet v. Beugnet · Ramirez v. State · Herrera v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[D]irect proof of an agreement is not necessary to establish a conspiracy; the jury is free to infer from all the circumstances surrounding and accompanying the act that the common purpose to commit the crime existed.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.