Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

558 So. 2d 168

Douglas v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1990-03-14

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently March 1996

6 state decisions

Relies on 554 So. 2d 616 - Huff v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1990-03-14

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

FRANK, Acting Chief Judge.

¶1The appellant has raised two points on appeal, only one of which is meritorious. The order of probation placed the following conditions on the appellant’s behavior: first, he is not allowed to live with members of the opposite sex and, second, he is not to come within three blocks of a known high crime area. Both of these conditions are invalid. Huff v. State, 554 So.2d 616 (Fla.2d DCA 1989).

¶2The conditions of probation are stricken but all other aspects of this matter are affirmed.

HALL and PATTERSON, JJ., concur.
/558/so2d/168 · .json · Public domain