State v. Jones’s Empirical Analysis
1990
Citation profile
11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
states following
May 2008
most recently cited
11 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 356 So. 2d 1370 - State v. Martin · 458 So. 2d 454 - State v. Martin · 416 So. 2d 78 - State v. Wheeler · State v. Weiland · 285 So. 2d 240 - State v. Smith
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“offered as an assertion to show the truth of the matters asserted therein,”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“The evidence is not truly expert testimony because it relates to matters well within the jury's understanding and is wholly without value to the trier of fact in reaching a decision; the inference or opinion is abstract and indirect; and it relates to an ultimate issue rather than a collateral matter. When an objection is raised to the introduction of an expert's opinion or inference, care should be taken by the trial judge to assess the statement in light of each of the foregoing variables.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Hearsay evidence is testimony in court, or written evidence, of a statement made out of court, the statement being offered as an assertion to show the truth of matters asserted therein, and thus resting for its value upon the credibility of the out-of-court asserter.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.