558 So. 2d 69 - Saffor v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1990
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
March 2015
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 559 So. 2d 187 - State v. Law · 492 So. 2d 1344 - Fowler v. State · 479 So. 2d 858 - CPP v. State · 504 So. 2d 9 - Valdez v. State · 473 So. 2d 841 - Howard v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In order to convict one of aiding and abetting in a crime, the State must establish: (1) that the defendant assisted the actual perpetrator by doing or saying something that caused, encouraged, assisted, or incited the perpetrator to actually commit the crime; and (2) that the defendant had the specific intent to participate in the crime. C.P.P. v. State, 479 So.2d 858 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985); Howard v. State, 473 So.2d 841 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985); Valdez v. State, 504 So.2d 9 (Fla.2d DCA 1986). Neither mere knowledge that an offense is being committed nor presence at the scene of the crime and flight therefrom are sufficient to establish participation with the requisite criminal intent.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.