Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 558 So. 2d 772 - Manders v. Singleton

558 So. 2d 772 - Manders v. Singleton’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
December 2015
most recently cited

9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently December 2015

9 state decisions

70199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Dixie Drive It Yourself System New Orleans Co. v. American Beverage Co. · 550 So. 2d 577 - Penalber v. Blount · Sanders v. Hercules Sheet Metal, Inc. · 397 So. 2d 490 - Vermilion Corp. v. Vaughn · 427 So. 2d 1152 - Indus. Sand and Abrasives v. L. & NR Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The party opposing the motion for summary judgment is not in every instance required to file a counter-affidavit or other receivable evidence. The court must first determine whether the supporting documents presented by the moving party are sufficient to resolve all material fact issues. If they are not the motion must be denied. Only if they are sufficient does the burden shift to the opposing party to present evidence showing that material facts are still at issue; only at this point may he no longer rest on the allegations and denials contained in his pleadings. Sanders v. Hercules Sheet Metal, Inc., 385 So.2d 772 (La.1980); Parker v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 418 So.2d 1361 (La.App. 2nd Cir.1982), on rehearing.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “When a motion for summary judgment is made and supported as provided above, an adverse party may not rest on the mere allegations or denials of his pleading, but his response, by affidavits or as otherwise provided above, must set forth specific facts showing that there is a genuine issue for trial. If he does not so respond, summary judgment, if appropriate, shall be rendered against him.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to material fact, and that mover is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.