558 So. 2d 814 - Davis v. Davis’s Empirical Analysis
2007
Citation profile
12 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently November 2018
12 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 444 So. 2d 358 - Brown v. Credit Center, Inc. · Short v. Columbus Rubber and Gasket Co. · 519 So. 2d 413 - Grisham v. JOHN Q. LONG VFW POST, NO. 4057, INC. · 459 So. 2d 783 - Pearl River Cty. Bd. v. South East Collections · 513 So. 2d 595 - Reeves Royalty Co. v. ANB Pump Truck Service
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) The foreign judgment was obtained as a result of some false representation without which the judgment would not have been rendered, or (2) The rendering court did not have jurisdiction over the parties or the subject matter.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“All actions founded on any judgment or decree rendered by any court of record without this state shall be brought within seven years after the rendition of such judgment or decree, and not after. However, if the person against whom such judgment or decree was or shall be rendered, was, or shall be at the time of the institution of the action, a resident of this state, such action, founded on such judgment or decree, shall be commenced within three years next after the rendition thereof, and not after.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“[i]n order to prevail and stay the execution of these foreign judgments, it was incumbent upon Howard to take affirmative action; he did not ... Procedurally, Howard should have timely filed an answer or response to Barbara's enrollment efforts within twenty days of and from December 27, 1985.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.