558 So. 2d 821 - Newman v. Newman’s Empirical Analysis
1990
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 27 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently October 2015 · most notably 639 So. 2d 909 - Hemsley v. Hemsley (1994), 557 So. 2d 793 - Bowe v. Bowe (1990)
1 federal appellate · 27 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 10 U.S.C. § 1408
Relies on 10 Cal. 3d 592 - In Re Marriage of Fithian · Cearley v. Cearley · 211 So. 2d 509 - Mitchell v. Craft · 42 Cal. 3d 131 - Casas v. Thompson · 437 So. 2d 410 - Tedford v. Dempsey
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a former spouse's rights vel non in his or her former mate's military retirement pension ... is subject to the personal property laws of the states. ...”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“the party seeking to show that he has established a new domicile has the burden of producing evidence that the party has chosen and acquired a new domicile and further the burden of persuading the trier of fact that the evidence preponderates to that effect.” Newman v. Newman, 558 So.2d 821, 825 (Miss.1990). Stated otherwise, the burden of proof is the”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Where the serviceman had his domicile in a community property state for all or a part of the time he served in the armed forces, this state will respect rights the law of such state vests in the serviceman's former spouse.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.