Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 558 So. 2d 877 - Isbell v. Smith

558 So. 2d 877 - Isbell v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis

1989

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
December 2008
most recently cited

7 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Nantahala Power & Light Co. v. Thornburg · Baxter v. Federal Communications Commission · Anderson v. State · Phillips v. Texas · Ex Parte Finance America Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"`This Court has generally held that improper arguments by an attorney are not sufficient grounds for a new trial without a timely objection and a ruling by the trial court or a refusal by the trial court to make a ruling. Lawrence v. Alabama Power Co., 385 So.2d 986, 987 (Ala.1980). The exception to this rule is "where the comment is so prejudicial that its effect is ineradicable." Banner Welders, Inc. v. Knighton, 425 So.2d 441, 450 (Ala. 1982).' " Isbell v. Smith, 558 So.2d 877, 881 (Ala. 1989), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 821 , 111 S.Ct. 68 , 112 L.Ed.2d 42 (1990)."”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““Where several claims or parties have been joined, the suit may be brought in any county in which any one of the claims could properly have been brought. Whenever an action has been commenced in a proper county, additional claims and parties may be joined, pursuant to Rules 13, 14, 22 and 24, as ancillary thereto, without regard to whether that county would be a proper venue for an independent action on such claims or against such parties.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “' Ex parte Shelby County, 516 So.2d 525, 527 (Ala.1987) (quoting Ex parte Ford, 431 So.2d 1194, 1196 (Ala.1983), quoting Alabama Youth Services Board v. Ellis, 350 So.2d 405, 408 (Ala.1977)). A material defendant has been further defined by this Court as `”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.