Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 558 SW2D 641 - Spears v. Commonwealth

Spears v. Commonwealth’s Empirical Analysis

1977

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
2
states following
October 2005
most recently cited

4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently October 2005

4 state decisions

201977198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on East v. Commonwealth · Chesapeake & O. Ry. Co. v. Pittman · McGill v. Commonwealth · Coleman v. Commonwealth · Clark v. Commonwealth

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In weighing the testimony the jury should be in possession of all facts calculated to exert influence on a witness.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.