Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 559 BR 766 - In re Bushey

In re Bushey’s Empirical Analysis

2016

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
October 2018
most recently cited

Relationships

Applies 11 U.S.C. § 522 · 11 U.S.C. § 541

Relies on Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad · 134 S. Ct. 1188 - Law v. Siegel · Quynh Truong v. Allstate Insurance · Norwest Bank Nebraska, N.A. v. Tveten · General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. Anaya

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The starting point for interpreting a statute's meaning is the language of the statute itself.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.