Hoxha v. Holder’s Empirical Analysis
559 F.3d 157 · 2009
Citation profile
6 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 73 later decisions — most recently April 2024 · most notably Higgs v. Attorney General of United States (2011), Valdiviezo-Galdamez v. Attorney General of the United States (2011)
6 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (§ 242 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Ventura · Weinberger v. Salfi · Kost v. Kozakiewicz · Abdulrahman v. Ashcroft · Shabanali Ladha v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 73 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“our appellate procedure mandates that the appellant must provide in a single document — the appellate brief — both the issues for review and the supporting argument.”). 2 . We cannot review the BIA’s orders of December I, 2011 (affirming the denial of asylum and related relief), or December 23, 2011 (denying request to adjust bond conditions, see supra note 1). Therefore, to the extent that Maxwell complains about the IJ’s”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“An issue is waived unless a party raises it in its opening brief, and for those purposes a passing reference to an issue will not suffice to bring that issue before this court.”) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). 5 . Petitioners have filed a”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“raise or exhaust his or her remedies as to each claim or ground for relief [before the BIA] if he or she is to preserve the right of judicial review of that claim”). For example, counsel appears to argue, for the first time in this case, that Sultani's”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.