United States v. McMath’s Empirical Analysis
559 F.3d 657 · 2009
Citation profile
28 federal appellate · 8 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 51 later decisions — most recently August 2024 · most notably United States v. Moore (2011), United States v. Bell (2010)
28 federal appellate · 8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 922 (Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act)
Relies on United States v. Olano · Batson v. Kentucky · Johnson v. United States · Hernandez v. New York · Williams v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 51 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In assessing the effect of improper remarks, we consider: the nature and seriousness of the statement; whether the statement was invited by the conduct of defense counsel; whether the district court sufficiently instructed the jury to disregard such statements; whether the defense could counter the improper statement through rebuttal; and finally, whether the weight of the evidence was against the defendant.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“Snyder makes clear SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 10 mess that a summary denial does not allow us to assume that the prosecution's reason was credible; rather, the district court's silence leaves a void in the record that does not allow us to affirm the denial.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“if the passage of time precludes the district court from making such findings, or if it finds that the prosecutor's reasons are not credible”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Lisle v. Welborn
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.