Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 559 F.3d 932 - Griffin v. Wardrobe

Griffin v. Wardrobe’s Empirical Analysis

559 F.3d 932 · 2009

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
April 2019
most recently cited

2 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Applies 11 U.S.C. § 105 · 11 U.S.C. § 362 · 11 U.S.C. § 523 · 28 U.S.C. § 1738

Relies on Schwartz v. United States · Robert Gruntz Robert Gruntz v. Opinion County of Los Angeles · Mac Donald v. Mac Donald · Noli v. Commissioner · Mataya v. Kissinger

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(d) On request of a party in interest and after notice and a hearing, the court shall grant relief from the stay ... such as by terminating, annulling, modifying, or conditioning such stay — ... (4)with respect to a stay of an act against real property under subsection (a), by a creditor whose claim is secured by an interest in such real property, if the court finds that the filing of the petition was part of a scheme to delay, hinder, or defraud creditors that involved either— (A) transfer of all or part ownership of, or other interest in, such real property without the consent of the secured creditor or court approval; or (B) multiple bankruptcy filings affecting such real property. If recorded in compliance with applicable State laws governing notices of interests or liens in real property, an order entered under paragraph (4) shall be binding in any other case under this title purporting to affect such real property filed not later than 2 years after the date of the entry of such order by the court, except that a debtor in a subsequent case under this title may move for relief from such order based upon changed circumstances or for good cause shown, after notice and a hearing.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “A creditor could petition the bankruptcy court for relief that is broad enough to encompass the cause of action, [or] could seek an order from the bankruptcy court clarifying the relief from stay order[.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.